Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to newfundcap.com

Newfund Capital - VC Firm | Investing in the Entrepreneurial Age · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
59match
automotiveventures.com
Automotive Ventures
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
53match
grovevc.com
Early-Stage Venture Capital (VC) in Israel | Grove Ventures
3 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
53match
luptoncapital.com
Lupton Capital
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
52match
lakesideinvest.com
The entrepreneur's startup network - connecting investors & startups
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
52match
cscleasing.com
Non-dilutive Technology and Equipment Leasing | CSC Leasing
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
51match
genevagp.com
The Geneva Group
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
51match
allegiscyber.com
AllegisCyber Capital
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
50match
luigisenese.com
Luigi Senese
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorystartups
50match
damirperge.com
Damir Perge | Entrepreneur-Investor-Author
3 co-citations1 shared categorystartups
49match
generalatlantic.com
General Atlantic | Powering Visionary Growth
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital
49match
clavystbio.com
ClavystBio | Accelerating Life Sciences Translation
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybiotech-and-biomedical-industry
49match
metaedgeventures.com
Metaedge Ventures | Building Coherence in the Exponential Age
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryventure-capital

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.