Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to newfederer.com

New Federer Solutions – Developers for gaming sector · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
3beestudio.com
3Bees Studio – Gaming Solutions
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
maxgamingstudios.com
Max Gaming Studios – Making Games for Gamers Like Us
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
0-xp.com
YetiBytes – Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
dogdaygames.com
Dog Day Games – Software developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
cluttercloudgames.com
ClutterCloud Games – game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
maxbennett.dev
Max Bennett – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
ktium.com
Pig Fly Games – Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
mateigiurgiu.com
Matei Giurgiu – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
mathewpalumbo.com
Mathew Palumbo – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
robertpercival.com
Robert Percival – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
adv.ec
ADVEC – Ecuadorian Video Game Developers Association
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
benpeterson.dev
Ben Peterson – XR / Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
faustlogic.com
Faust Logic – Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
grittydev.com
Home – The Gritty Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
bombinabox.com
BombInABox – Development Blog
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
0resmon.com
0RESMON - Enterprise Game Solutions & Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
intetic.com
Intetic – Gaming Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
mateuszpk.com
Mateusz Parfieńczyk – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.