Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nevemlaci.dev

Nevemlaci | Dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
rollingcoders.com
HOME | default
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
belderbos.dev
Bob Belderbos | Developer & Team Coaching
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
interglacial.com
Interglacial
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
arturoo404.com
Java Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
braedenturner.com
Braeden Turner
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
nevezhyn.com
Roman Nevezhyn
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
thekotlindev.com
The Kotlin Dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
thomasdeverin.com
Thomas Deverin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
coderdeveloped.com
Coder Developed
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mattbecker.com
Coding Journeys
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bfostdev.net
b foster dev blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rodrigopinho.com
Rodrigo Pinho | Senior Software Engineer | Java | Spring | AWS | DevOps
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codewithbhai.com
codewithbhai | Android Developer & 30 Days Course
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
thenonfunctionaldev.com
The NonFunctional Dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
alanfletcher.dev
Experienced Software Developer - Alan Fletcher | Delphi/Pascal Expert | Alan Fletcher
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewgarcia.tech
Andrew Garcia – Programmer & Developer Advocate
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
bloodypk.com
Home - BPK Development
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
codesnipeet.com
Web Development Guides
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.