Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to nedformn.com

Home – Ned Carroll for House · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
henslinforhouse.com
Henslin for House
2 shared topicspolitics
68match
mad4nm.com
Home ⋆ Mad4NM
2 shared topicspolitics
68match
hetrickforhouse.com
Hetrick for House
2 shared topicselections
68match
garnerformissouri.com
Kevin Garner for Missouri – Vote Kevin Garner for Missouri House District 24
2 shared topicselections
67match
shawnforiowa.com
Home Campaign - Shawn for Iowa House 57
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
dkt4pa.com
Deirdre Kamber Todd for PA House – District 183
2 shared topicselections
67match
antonyghee.com
Tony Ghee – Antony Ghee for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
callihanforokhouse.com
Callihan for OK House District 38
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
supportgenewu.com
Gene Wu for Texas House
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
andybforcolorado.com
HOME | Andy for Colorado
2 shared topicspolitics
67match
angelachainer.com
Angela Chainer For House of Delegates - District 56
2 shared topicselections
67match
diniforhoboken.com
Home | Dini For Hoboken
2 shared topicselections
66match
garciasanderforhouse.com
Lori Garcia Sander for House District 65 – Putting Colorado Citizens and Families First
2 shared topicspolitics
66match
kodifortexas.com
Home - Kodi Sawin
2 shared topicselections
66match
madisonbolay.com
Madison Bolay – Madison Bolay
2 shared topicspolitics
66match
rickkoch.com
Rick Koch – Rick Koch
2 shared topicselections
66match
camforschoolboard.com
Cam For School Board – Saving Future Generations
2 shared topicspolitics
66match
district28team.com
Your LD28 Team – Carroll – Pingerelli – Livingston
2 shared topicspolitics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.