similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to nedandrew.com

Nedandrew alternatives & similar sites

Ned Andrew Solomon — Writer, Editor, Facilitator, Speaker, Artist, Musician — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sarahbaylorwrites.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Sarah Baylor – reader, writer, editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cwanderson.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	C. W. Anderson \| Brooklyn-Based Writer, Filmmaker, Artist	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandrachait.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sandra Chait – writer, educator, wife, mother, and grandmother	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samdowns.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Sam Downs \| Writer, Editor, Critic	en	books-and-literature Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joehessert.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Joe Hessert ✍️ Writer, Editor, SEO & Digital Marketing	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolinedonald.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Caroline Donald website – writer, editor, curator and speaker	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalsingularity.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kevin S. Parikh, CEO, Author, Speaker, Futurist, and Philanthropist.	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnprevas.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	John Prevas \| Author, Speaker, Mediator, and Classics Scholar	US~ en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
natashalehrer.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Natasha Lehrer \| writer, editor, translator	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cassieahmoore.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Cassie A.H. Moore – Author, Speaker, & Leadership and Engagement Consultant	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sampopewriter.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sam Pope – Writer, editor, storyteller, wordsmith	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diamondgizellebraxton.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Diamond Braxton – Editor and Writer.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sam-huber.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sam Huber – writer \| teacher \| editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joadrwren.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Joad R Wren – writer: news, readings, blog, music	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
suzanneparrott.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Suzanne Fyhrie Parrott - Author, Designer, Illustrator, Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
denisesantomauro.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Denise Santomauro	en	books-and-literature Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
susandemuth.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Susan de Muth \| London-based writer, editor and translator	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
suzannevanatten.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Suzanne Van Atten – Writer ● Editor ● Writing Coach	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.