Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nativez.dev

nativez.dev - Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
natejms.com
natejms - software developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
narakcode.dev
NarakCODE - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewnt.dev
Andrew Nguyen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
amitxtech.com
Amit Chaudhary - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
pavankulkarni.com
Pavan Kulkarni - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
deonhua.com
Deon Hua | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
albert-gonzalez.dev
Albert González - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
nateamack.com
Nate Amack, Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
abdulhakeem.dev
AbdulHakeem Shaik - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
amitray.dev
Amit Ray — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
amirsolo.com
Amir Solo – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
adityamehra.org
Aditya Mehra | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kieracarman.com
Kiera Carman | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
pedrozurita.com
Pedro Zurita | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ashleyhylton.com
Ashley Hylton | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.