Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nathanjin.com

Nathan Jin Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
nathandubeau.com
Nathan Dubeau Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
evansminotwood.com
Evans Minot Wood - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
alecotterson.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
evolune.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
reneantoun.com
Rene | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
chinosoft-eng.com
Miguel Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
nahidtopalovic.com
Nahid's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
adityabhatkar.dev
Aditya — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
devsanthony.com
CS Portfolio | Anthony Dominguez
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
adiunni.tech
Adiunni | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
arsoniv.tech
Arsoniv's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
devshreyas.com
Shreyas's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
pauljamesportfolio.com
Paul James Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
simoncha.com
Simon Cha Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
devpatel35.com
Dev Patel| Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alessiopoggi.org
Alessio Poggi Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
annasicoli.com
Anna Sicoli Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
makvasic.com
Mak Vasic — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.