Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nathanielbauer.com

Nathaniel Bauer CS Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
natewolffe.com
Nathaniel Wolffe | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
chekwubeononuju.com
Portfolio | Your Name
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
arturoalanis.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ammarridho.dev
Ammar Ridho — Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
sinanfiroz.dev
Portfolio-Sinan Firoz
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
ayushverma.tech
Full-Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
aneeshn.com
Aneesh Nair - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
anom.dev
Anom Chakravorty | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
adrianxshala.dev
AI-Enhanced Full Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexkamwende.dev
Alex Kamwende | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
pavnimanocha.com
Pavni Manocha | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
manitgarg.com
Manit Garg - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anhadmehrotra.dev
Anhad Mehrotra Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
chetanverma.com
Chetan Verma - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
ahmdrz.com
Ahmed Raza Khan - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
charansai.app
Charan Sai | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
abdulhannan.me
Abdul Hannan Bhatti Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kilanvanloo.com
Kilan van Loo
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.