Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nathangauer.com

Nathan Gauër | Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
bunetz.dev
Bunetz's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
msbarbieri.dev
MSbarbieri Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
huseyingulyol.com
Hüseyin GÜLYOL
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
reezvee.dev
Reezvee Sikder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
holasoyeddy.com
A Blog by Eddy Rubio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buffalocomputergraphics.com
Buffalo Computer Graphics | Buffalo Computer Graphics
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
judejay.dev
Jude Jonathan | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buildcoolship.dev
BuildCoolShip - Developer Project Management
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
simonzeng.com
Simon Zeng | Software Engineer and Computer Science Student
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
ataulm.com
Ataul Munim – Ataul Munim
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ovijit.com
Ovijit Karmokar
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
bugrahan.me
Home – Buğrahan Kök
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
craigmoir.com
Craig Moir
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ebrouwer.dev
Ethan Brouwer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abiraja.com
Abi Raja — Engineering & Product
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
atanasrusev.com
Atanas Rusev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
absoluteparallax.com
Absolute Parallax: Software Engineer Portfolio | Absolute Parallax
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
adhikadhikari.dev
Adhik Adhikari | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.