Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to natewhite.dev

Nate White · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
natebuttke.com
Nate Buttke
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
nateberkopec.com
Nate Berkopec
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
naterose.io
Home – Nate Rose
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
naterose.ai
Home – Nate Rose
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ilovefireball.com
jaronpate (Jaron) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
im8bit.com
im8bit – Dev Blog, White Hat Hacker Stuff, Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
articulatecode.dev
Articulate Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
angworld.com
A new beginning
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
imkate.dev
Kate Belinskaya
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
nateware.com
Nate Wiger | How many beers until the bugs are fixed?
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
resonatehq.io
Resonate — Durable Execution, Dead Simple
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
adityarana.tech
Aditya Rana
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
dev-diaries.com
Dev Diaries | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
architecture.tech
Architecture·Tech
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
natetheprogrammer.com
Nate the Programmer – Envision. Create. Improve.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andrewpla.tech
Andrew Pla | My site where I talk about things. Stay in touch!
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
ampactor.dev
Morgan Espitia — Systems Engineer | Rust · DSP · Embedded · Solana
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nate-kuhl.com
nate kuhl is a software engineer based in midwest USA 🇺🇸
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.