Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to natekrasner.com

Nate Krasner — Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
hishamahmer.com
Hisham Ahmer — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
73match
elbaraaabdalla.com
Elbaraa Abdalla — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
murfidya.app
Alfian Murfidya — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
abhishankar.dev
Abhishek Shankar — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
ehlaamimran.com
Ehlaam Imran — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
72match
chanekmongkol.com
Chan Ekmongkol — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
0gm.app
0GM — 0G Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
bylilodesign.com
Liliana Lopez-Diaz — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
askjun.org
askJun — AI Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
julie-ni.com
Julie's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
muhammadirfanluthfi.com
Muhammad Irfan Luthfi — Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
tfagan.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
alecprats.dev
Alec Prats — Portfolio v2 Mockup
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
buildaihw.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
alanagoh.me
Alana Goh — Portfolio & Writing
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
albahri.org
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
alex-zc.me
portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
anoopkarnik.net
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.