Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nateking.dev

Nathan A. King - AI Engineer & Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
arthurkamsky.com
Arthur Kamsky — Product Designer & Design Engineer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
devikap.com
Devika | Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
designerai.com
designer ai
2 shared topicsdesign
69match
3laws.studio
3LAWS — Human. Ethic. Design.
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
8px.ai
8px - AI Design Tool
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
anjlinair.com
Anjli Nair — Senior Product Designer and Researcher
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
angelalinzm.com
Angela Lin · Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
denisefremov.com
Denis Efremov — Product Designer & AI Architect
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
ilonawrites.com
Ilona writes – I’m Ilona — a designer exploring the intersection of philosophy, technology, AI and the quiet questions of everyday life.
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
khushboochandnani.com
KC: Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
68match
anandmoon.com
Anand Moon | AI Product Designer for SaaS & Design Systems
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
makimiyano.com
Maki Miyano : AI Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
nandutangella.com
Nandu Tangella — Product Designer | UX Designer | AI Design Specialist
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
siyukath.com
Siyu Zhong · Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
simpleshaun.com
Shaun Herron | Senior Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
brandsupply.co.uk 🇬🇧
Logo design | Free AI brand generator & design contests
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
imfrankecg.com
Frank Cala - AI Art Director & Multidisciplinary Designer - Barcelona
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
khiemisme.com
KHIEMISME – Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.