Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to natejms.com

natejms - software developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
andrewnt.dev
Andrew Nguyen - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
83match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
amirsolo.com
Amir Solo – Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
amitray.dev
Amit Ray — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
pedrozurita.com
Pedro Zurita | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
simoncodes.com
Simon | Software Developer | Full-stack
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
nafania.com
Anya Saunders | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
amitxtech.com
Amit Chaudhary - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arhandky.dev
Arhan Dönerkaya • Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pavankulkarni.com
Pavan Kulkarni - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
akshaybenny.com
Akshay Benny | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
khwandao.com
Khwandao Aitsara — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewhickey.tech
Andrew Hickey - Freelance Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
najmiter.dev
Najam ul Hassan - Full Stack Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
sinanaseri.com
Sina Naseri — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
deonhua.com
Deon Hua | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
khalil-m.com
Khalil Makhloufi // Full-Stack Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.