Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nateeagle.com

NateEagle.com: A blog about code and cocktails. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
bakson.dev
bakson.dev | Developer’s blog mainly about .NET and DevOps stuff
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
abbasov.info
Aydin Abbasov | About me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aspiremedia.net
Aspire Media | a web development and technology blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andresleiva.com
J. Andrés Leiva Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arex388.com
Blogging about .NET development, Windows administration, and hobbies | A388
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewjmccarthy.com
Andrew J. McCarthy
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
euichan.dev
Eui’s Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
8he.net
Robert Accettura's Fun With Wordage – Robert Accettura's Personal Blog on Web Development and Tech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
2pif.com
2πf: blog and tech projects
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ananthcode.com
Ananth Code
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewpauluhn.dev
AWP Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ashsmith.io
Ash Smith — Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arsenemerci.dev
Arsene Merci
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arye.dev
Blog - Arye Shalev Dev Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
makaroni4.com
A blog by @makaroni4
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aidanlaycock.dev
Aidan Laycock's Dev Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thakurcoder.com
thakurcoder | Blog & Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abdullh.tech
Abdullah | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.