similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to natchaistappers.com

Natchai Stappers – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

anneboothauthor.com

Anne Booth – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Amy Tordoff – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

Dev Kothari – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

ashlenbrown.com

Ashlen Brown – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

natalienera.com

Natalie Nera – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Renée Beyea – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

angelasweeney.com

Angela Sweeney – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

desireeultican.com

Desiree Ultican – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

kimberlysavage.com

KIMBERLY SAVAGE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsfiction

patricekasimov.com

Patrice Kasimov – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anitahalvorssen.com

Anita Halvorssen – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

singingmagpies.com

Michael Pattarozzi – Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

nansubugamakumbi.com

Jennifer Nansubuga Makumbi – Author

2 shared topicsfiction

alariccabiling.net

ALARIC CABILING's OFFICIAL SITE – AUTHOR

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim O'Shea | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

abbiewoodbridgeauthor.com

Abbie Woodbridge Author

2 shared topicsfiction

bethannbauman.com

Beth Ann Bauman | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

devikaponnambalam.com

Devika Ponnambalam | Author

2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.