Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to natanfernandes.com

Natan Fernandes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
pcamposu.com
Patricio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
aalazz.me
Alexis Lazzarotto — Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
abuzer.tech
Abuzer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
ayub.dev
Yuana Ayub
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
eventloopsoftware.com
Eventloop software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
73match
artemsmikh.me
Artem Mikhailov | @artemsmikh
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
managementuncensored.com
Welcome!
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
asary.me
asary anhairi
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
devanandersen.com
Devan Andersen
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
ilanbouhadana.com
Ilan Bouhadana
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexborisov.org
Alex Borisov
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
abbeyhawksparrow.com
Abbey Hawk Sparrow : Software Developer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
albaraamansour.dev
Al-Baraa Mansour
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
alexandrefrancois.org
Alexandre R.J. François | ARJF
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rikus.dev
Rikus de Milander
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
adamstirtan.net
Adam Stirtan
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
amolpatel.com
Amol Patel - Software Engineer
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
badshashekander.org
Badsha Shekander
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.