Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to natalieluca.com

Natalie Luca – Autorin · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
lotte-woess.com
Lotte Wöss – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pialueddecke.de 🇩🇪
Pia Lüddecke – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
julianedeinert.com
Juliane Deinert – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
skbroser.de 🇩🇪
Sarah K. Broser – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
juliane-d.com
Juliane D. - Startseite
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
juliaach.com
Julia Ach – Ach, die Autorin!
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
jstrobel.com
Joachim Strobel – Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
julia-rogasch.com
Julia Rogasch - Autorenseite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
adleymarrow.com
Autorin |
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
luciuswinter.com
Lucius Winter – Autorenwebsite
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
junafinn.com
Juna Finn - Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
aeraofgods.org
Markus Heitz – Autor & Kreativer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
angela-c-popp.com
Angela C Popp – Autorin – Sprecherin – Fotografin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
cosmicturmoil.com
Ramona Beyer – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
julie-bender.com
Julie Bender | Autorin | Kinderbücher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
sienna-wolfe.de 🇩🇪
Sienna Wolfe Autorin - Startseite
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
sk-autorin.de 🇩🇪
Sylvia Koppermann — Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
julia-jenner.com
Home - Julia Jenner
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.