Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nat-ray.com

Nat Ray · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
natbaca.com
Nat Baca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nathillard.com
Nat Baca
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aniketraj.me
Aniket Raj
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
natduffy.com
Nat Duffy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
testraven.com
Test Raven
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
aazo11.dev
Amir A. Zohrenejad personal page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
aazo11.com
Amir A. Zohrenejad personal page
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nashfv.com
Nash FV
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
charlieray.dev
Charlie Ray
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
evoleinik.com
Eugene Oleinik
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ankit.io
Ankit Ranjan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
renegadeworlds.com
Josh Grancell
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
patrawi.com
PATRAWI – share what I have learned and read
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
retweetradar.com
Retweet Radar
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alancfrancis.com
Alan Francis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nathagey.com
Nat Hagey | SWE
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
naseraleisa.com
Naser Aleisa - Software developer and troubleshooter
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simplemule.com
Simple Mule | I plan to post on things I am building or learning about
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.