Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nasrinpatel.com

Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
desigatopia.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
85match
siyatawinfield.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
77match
kinvetehdit.com
Sante Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
76match
andresbotia.com
resume-portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
75match
addieeverson-portfolio.com
Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
75match
ethalorian.com
Craig's Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
74match
andrez.net
Andrez - Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
74match
amorphioso.com
Hallie's Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
74match
anchalankola.com
Anchal's Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
73match
kim-folio.com
Portfolio - Kim John
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
73match
nachodesigner.com
Portfolio Nacho Guty
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
aadhithya.cloud
Aadhithya's Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
abuzaher.net
Bosa Portfolio Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
annicaadong.com
Annica Dong Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
mapleleung.com
Maple Leung Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
andrewlausportfolio.com
Andrew Lau | Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
annetesar.com
Anne Tesar | Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
annieprich.com
Annie Rich's Portfolio
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.