Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to narangkay.com

Krish Narang's Resume · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
aarjavjain.tech
Aarjav's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
72match
algernon-intelligence.com
Lorena G. || Interactive Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
71match
goncuesma.com
GCM's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
viveksaini.com
Vivek's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
cheqri.com
Cheqri's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
khoistudios.com
Interactive Arcade Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
bebo11.com
xxx2551's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
bebo6666.com
xxx2551's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
beibo567.com
xxx2551's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
beyondresume.ai
Beyond Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
70match
chasbean.com
Chas Bean — Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
69match
dereksresume.com
Derek Taylor's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
69match
arkaengineering.tech
IT Entrepreneur | Interactive Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
69match
azaris.net
Reza Azari's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
68match
alanhendrickson.com
My Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
68match
aidanpowell.net
Aidan Powell's Resume
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
68match
beyondwordsresumes.com
Beyond Words Resumes
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice
68match
aaquib.tech
Aaquib's Resume | Faces
1 shared topicsresume-writing-and-advice

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.