Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to napatsc.com

napatsc · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
sjmohe.com
ClawAi
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
iliall.com
Ilia Alenabi
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
nanoheal.com
Nanoheal
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
chihancui.com
Chihan Cui
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
annaha.net
Anna Ha
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
nabiloh.com
Nabil Ould Hamou - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
nathanhogg.com
Nathan Hogg - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
anirudhv.dev
Anirudh Vemuri - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
amkrishna.com
Aditya Manoj Krishna - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
denizcoban.dev
deniz coban - cs @ uoft
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
siyaryucel.com
Siyarcan Yücel
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
aalomar.me
Abdullah Alomar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
denis-mbey-akola.com
Denis Mbey Akola
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
kimchidude.com
Derek Jeong's portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
chloeakiko.com
Chloe Akiko Hughes
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
imaginationprinter.com
Erin McCarthy – Graduate Student at the University of Oregon
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
anaselalaoui.com
Anas El Alaoui — CS Student | AI & ML
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
anirudhmanjesh.dev
Anirudh Manjesh | Computer Science Student & ML Researcher
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.