Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nangefen.com

Nan Fink Gefen – Writer and Publisher · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
makmillard.com
MM – Writer and editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
alexandravsmith.com
Alex Smith – Writer and Educator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
angellawhitton.com
Angella Whitton – Writer and Booklover
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
annemscriven.com
Anne M Scriven – Writer, teacher and performer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
alexgrantham.com
AE Grantham – Writer and Facilitator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
annileenewton.com
Annilee Newton – writer and writing teacher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
annheitland.com
Ann Heitland – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
adarshprakashan.com
adarsh Prakashan – WordPress Theme for Authors and Publishers
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terianderholm.com
Teri Anderholm – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
amiworthen.com
Ami Worthen – Writer and collaborator for collective liberation.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
etsummers.com
E.T. Summers – Writer, Illustrator, Creative Director, Publisher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
terrihanauer.com
Writer, Published Author and Director - Author, Writer and Director
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
annabrunobooks.com
Anna Bruno – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
marcivan.com
Marc-Ivan O'Gorman – WRITER
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
skamppub.com
SKAMP Publisher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kileyawrites.com
Kiley Autumn – Writer for children
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
chelseaboes.com
Chelsea Boes – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
aislingsmith.com
Aisling Smith – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.