Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nancappo.com

Nan Willard Cappo - about the author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
patvaldata.com
Pat Valdata - About Pat
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
rescuersfromillur.com
- Cajah The Author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
biancasloane.com
Bianca Sloane I Author of Suspense Novels about the Dark Side of Love
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
paulyantus.com
Black Void – More about the book and author
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
annabelle-vale-author.com
The Authors Haven
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
paula-friedman.com
Paula Friedman - a welcome from author Paula Friedman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ashley-thomas-sheikh.com
- The Website of Author Ashley Thomas Sheikh
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
ashley-sheikh.com
- The Website of Author Ashley Thomas Sheikh
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
andybeardmore.com
Andrew Beardmore - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bethanyblakeauthor.com
Bethany Blake - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
alejandrovarela.net
Alejandro Varela - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
demerybunn.com
Home | D. Emery Bunn, Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
andrewmioni.com
Andrew Mioni | Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
bethtoole.com
Beth Toole | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
desireematlock.com
About - Desiree Matlock | Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
kimbeattyauthor.com
Kim Beatty, Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
maldouglas.com
Mal Douglas - Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
andywalker.net
Andy Walker - Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.