Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nanazimmer.com

Nana Zimmer | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
evanking.dev
Evan King | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
0xomer.com
Omer | Software Engineer & Instructor
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
kirizuro.dev
Claudio Junior | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ammarnassri.com
Ammar Nassri | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
andydelgado.dev
Andy Delgado | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
renzoromeo.dev
Renzo Romeo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
cheuchheangsear.com
Cheuchheang Sear | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
majddev.com
Majd Hemud | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
deneejones.com
Denee Jones - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
imayush.dev
Ayush Kumar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alanxgarcia.dev
Alan Garcia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ifeanyi.dev
Ifeanyi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
devanshwalia.com
Devansh Walia | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
godstime.dev
Godstime Agholor | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
khubaibqaiser.com
Khubaib Qaiser | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
argenh.dev
Arge Niño - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ammaryaqoob.com
Ammar Yaqoob | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.