similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to namlini.com

namlini · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

agileos · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

avh-dev · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

ignitepaintball.com

matthewdurham · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

mangalitza-io · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

makoteh (MakoTeh) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

akshchand (Aksh) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Denoncode (Denon Code) · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

andrewhall (Andrew Hall) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

eugenloncaric.com

eugenloncaric (Eugen Loncaric) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

andrewbmccullough.com

andrewbmccullough (Andrew McCullough) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

kittykimono.com

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

gnaux · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Kiena · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Nabat · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

NaPoS · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

passwordlessapps.com

Tidas · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

eveble · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.