Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to namishh.com

index | namishh · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
bytedecoder.me
Rodrigo Reyes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
bsalinas.com
Ben Salinas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
gabrieledigilio.com
Gabriele Digilio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
honzcha.com
About
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
mrgrossman.com
MATTHEWGROSSMAN - Matthew Grossman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
pamelakaercher.com
PamelaKaercher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
burakekici.com
Home | Burak Ekici
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gabrielbirman.com
Gabriel Birman's Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
home-planets.com
Home Planets . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . ݁ – My personal websites
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
justinqxia.com
Justin Xia
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
murtadha.dev
Murtadha - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
gabbifisher.com
Gabbi Fisher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
reidswan.com
Reid Swan – Reid's personal website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mtnkenney.com
Matt Kenney | Matt’s personal website.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
muhammedalidogan.com
Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
remidurand.com
Rémi DURAND - Personal Website
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewharrop.com
Andrew Harrop
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
accountpowered.com
Arman's Portal — notes, comparisons, experiments
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.