Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to named-data.net

Named Data Networking (NDN) - A Future Internet Architecture · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
35match
gigabytesnetworks.com
Gigabyte Networks
6 shared tech1 shared categorycomputer-networking
34match
gudnetworks.com
GudNetworks – A Networking Blog
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorycomputer-networking
33match
swernetworks.com
Swer Networks – Engineer-led networks, zero chaos
5 shared tech1 shared categorycomputer-networking
33match
certanetworks.com
Certa Networks – Secure Reliable Network Services
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security
33match
ampito-europe.com
Ampito – Your IT Solutions Partner
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
33match
ampito-group.com
Ampito – Your IT Solutions Partner
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
33match
ampito.com
Ampito – Your IT Solutions Partner
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
33match
ampitoafrica.com
Ampito – Your IT Solutions Partner
1 co-citations6 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
32match
uprootnetworks.com
Uproot Networks
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categoryinformation-and-network-security
32match
fouriernetworksolutions.com
FOURIER_NETWORK_SOLUTIONS - Home
4 shared tech1 shared categorycomputer-networking
32match
milwaukeeitsolution.com
Computer Repair Services Network Service Milwaukee, Wisconsin
4 shared tech1 shared categoryit-and-internet-support
32match
lamejournal.com
MovingPackets.net - Internetworking Views and Reviews
4 shared tech1 shared categorycomputer-networking

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.