Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nambinotes.com

Nambi Publishing House · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
acadpubl.org
Academic Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
77match
ebookcph.com
Charotar Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
76match
ecopublishinghouse.com
Home - Eco Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acp-testing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acpublishing.com
AC Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
75match
acadpubl.com
Home - Academic Publishing House
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
anistemipublishing.org
Anistemi Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
acrpublishing.com
ACR Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
74match
anewdaypublishing.com
A New Day Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
alacrityhousepublishing.com
Alacrity House Publishing LLC
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
a2npublishing.com
A2N Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
73match
bryanhousepub.com
Bryan House Publishing Limited
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
algolpublishing.com
Algol Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
hispubg.com
HIS Publishing Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
ashmontpublishing.com
Ashmont Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
jubaeapublishing.com
Jubaea Publishing
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
academicpublishings.com
Academic Publishing -
1 shared topicspublishing-industry
72match
pagepublishinggroup.com
Page Publishing Group
1 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.