Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to namangoyal.com

Naman Goyal · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
namanajmera.com
Naman Ajmera
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
namangupta.dev
Naman Gupta — AI Engineer & Agent Builder
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
ashishgoyalml.com
Ashish Goyal - Machine Learning Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
imannazri.com
Iman Nazri
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
evangarris.com
Evan Garris
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
narunraman.com
Narun Raman
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
betterthanamplitude.com
Human Behavior
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
maksugr.com
Roman Ponomarev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
payamfakoorziba.com
Payam Fakoorziba
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
singularityfeed.com
Singularity Feed
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
andostronaut.com
Ando Ramanamihanta
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
0humaninput.com
Home | 0 Human Input
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
nathangwyn.com
Nathan Gwyn · Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
abdelrahmanhosny.me
Abdelrahman Hosny - AI Strategy & Implementation
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
aiassembler.dev
AI Assembler – Practical AI
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
man-meets-ai.com
Man Meets AI | Ship by Sunday
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
61match
abdelrhmaneldallal.com
Hello 👋 | Abdelrhman Eldallal
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
namanyayg.com
Namanyay Goel - Technology Product Entrepreneur, Founder, and Writer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.