Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to namadic.com

projects.standblue.net · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
namatic.com
projects.standblue.net
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
85match
skeebos.com
projects.standblue.net
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
projectlabs.id 🇮🇩
ProjectLabs
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
eutracker.app
EU Projects Tracker
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
projectpage.co.uk 🇬🇧
project page
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
accordproject.org
Accord Project
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
abelchin.my
Projects — Abel Chin
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
maintaina.com
The Horde Project
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
kinalta.com
Kinalta - Fast Lean Projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
sinaxhpm.com
Sina Xhpm — Personal Projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
patrisiu.com
patrisiu.com - Projects & Portfolio
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
skynet-insights.com
XTAM — Project Platform
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
arnoldbiffna.com
Arnold Biffna - Portfolio & Projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
artsdesignhk.com
AppServ Open Project 8.6.0
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
nalburaga.com
AppServ Open Project 9.3.0
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
jmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Jonathan Mathews Software | Projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
devflows.dev
DevFlows — Little teams, big projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
kickdraft.com
Kickdraft — From Ideas to Real Projects
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.