Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nalbook.com

Berkley - Penguin Books · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
nalauthors.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
100match
nalromance.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
100match
nalbooks.com
Berkley - Penguin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
4colorbooks.com
4 Color Books - Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pbaqrcode.com
Matthew Desmond Books - Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
dewinbooks.com
Dewin Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
angelsgame.net
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
8thcontinentbooks.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
abookofspiritsandthieves.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
agreatandterriblebeauty.net
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
averyexperts.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
averybook.biz
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
averybooks.biz
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
1000yearsbook.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
36arguments.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
100yearsofanne.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
derisionpoints.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
descartesbones.com
Penguin Random House
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.