Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to naiveweekly.com

Naive Weekly | Kristoffer | Substack · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
79match
dailymull.com
Virginia Watts | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
79match
biblonia.com
Biblonia | Dr Cristian Ispir | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
79match
elvygerez.com
Echoes | Elvy Gerez | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
79match
chroniclebookclub.com
Chronicle Book Club | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
79match
mfalore.com
MFA Lore | Aimee Liu | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
79match
annamarieobrien.com
Anna-Marie O'Brien | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
abigailtarttelin.com
Abigail Tarttelin | abigailtarttelin | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
78match
absurditi.com
In Black & White | Ditipriya Acharya | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
magdalenaponurska.com
Courage to Create | Magdalena Ponurska | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
annaeplin.com
Whatever the River Brings | Anna Eplin | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorypoetry
78match
dadpepohe.com
दडपे पोहे | Vishwesh Jirgale | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
78match
elizabethclarklau.com
cocktail napkin notes | Elizabeth Victoria Clark | Substack
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.