Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nahinbuezo.dev

Nahin Buezo — Fullstack Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
4dmu.dev
4Dmu — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
jrayga.com
Jason Rayga — Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
aaronaperez.dev
Aaron Perez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
fualog.com
Fuad — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
padusinski.com
Adam Padusiński — Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
9nth.dev
Kristián Kopera | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alamsyah.org
Alam | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
revantdev.com
Revan Toma | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ricardocolin.com
Ricardo Colin | Fullstack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abids.tech
Abid Shaikh — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
buildwithatul.dev
Atul | Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
adrianoliver.dev
Adrian Oliver — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andyvazquez.dev
Andy Vazquez — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
aaroneffendi.dev
Aaron Effendi — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abdulrehman.tech
Abdul Rahman Asif — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
buildwithkode.com
Karthik — Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rianafrianto.com
Rian Afrianto — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
async-atharv.com
Atharv Naik — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.