Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to naggama.com

::나까마시장:: · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
52match
baedalmaru.com
배달마루
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
52match
baghug77.com
백허그
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
jkmanlab.com
직구만랩 - 중국직구만렙을 위한 직구만랩
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
1mintip.com
이윰빌더
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
50match
genfuns.com
GENFUNS
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
42match
jinususan.com
진우수산
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
40match
manizoa.com
MANIZOA
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
40match
jeildiary.com
제일다이어리
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
40match
hanbyuloptical.com
Hanbyul Optical
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
40match
hobbyyama.com
하비야마
0 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
39match
dgcaution.com
찌랜드
2 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
38match
ivege.com
홈케어온라인 쇼핑공간에 오신 것을 환영합니다!
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryhousehold-supplies
38match
hanamontessori.com
하나몬테소리 쇼핑몰
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
38match
hiddencare.com
히든케어에 오신것을 환영합니다.
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
38match
dhtsound.com
DHTsound 진공관 오디오 종합 부품 쇼핑몰
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
37match
kkachipension.com
성동디지탈OA
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
37match
jik9tong.com
직구통 - 중국배대지, 타오바오 배대지
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping
37match
hitenakorea.com
앵글러스잡
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryshopping

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.