Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nagarjunac.dev

Nagarjuna Chamidisetty · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
n-arjun.com
Nagarjuna - BI Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bharathasok.com
Bharath Asok
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
chaseadams.dev
Chase Adams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
devilrancy.com
Teja Surisetty | Devilrancy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mallikarjunaswamy.com
Mallikarjuna Swamy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
devanshdubey.com
Devansh Dubey — Engineer, Builder, Storyteller
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
nafisazizi.com
Nafis Azizi Riza
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
arthurhammer.com
Arthur Hammer | Mobile Engineering Lead
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrewheekin.com
Andrew Heekin
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
adhirajpandey.tech
Adhiraj Pandey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
andrapra.dev
Andra Pradana - Engineer & Product Builder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bhornseth.com
Brandon Hornseth
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
aniltalla.com
Product and Engineering Leader - Anil Talla
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewbredow.com
Home – Andrew Bredow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arjunaherbst.com
Arjuna's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alawrence.tech
alawrence blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nagarajanr.com
Nagarajan Ravikumar · Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
simonlb.com
Simon Leboucher
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.