similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to nagarajans.com

Nagarajan - Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

demorishickman.com

Demoris B. Hickman - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alanchamplin.com

Alan Champlin - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

paulparisbooks.com

Paul Paris - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

theafricanauthors.com

African Authors

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

denikacarothersebook.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

patricialipe.com

Patricia Lipe - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Kim Doran - Author, Speaker, Life Coach

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

beverleybrenna.com

Beverley Brenna - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

impactauthorsacademy.com

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

evernestabooks.com

Tia Glomb -- Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

andreawoodauthor.com

Home - Andrea Wood, Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Anna Qu: Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Sis Deans | Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Home | Tess Marset - Author

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

2deoctubrenovel.com

JP Sullivan - Author of Spanish language Novels

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.