Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to naek2.com

Nicholas Kammer | Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
evanryan.dev
evan ryan - developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
pavece.com
Pavece developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
simproch.dev
Simon Prochazka | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
derekrwoods.com
Derek | Developer && Architect
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
alexdepasquale.dev
Alex De Pasquale | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
alexanderwang.dev
Alexander Wang | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
skurnog.com
Sebastian Skurnóg - PHP developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
evanbuss.com
Evan Buss - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
devcurry.com
.NET and Web Development Tutorials for Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
patosorio.com
Patricia Osorio - Python Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexandralim.dev
Alexandra Lim | Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
anjaramihone.com
Anja Ramihone : Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
abdulmannan.dev
Abdul Mannan - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
anmolbarik.com
Anmol Barik - Backend Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
estebanborai.com
Esteban Borai | Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.