Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to nadjn.com

重庆赫卡里姆物流有限公司 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
92match
jierihong.com
上海夏铭业物流有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
91match
hjpaqr.com
重庆勋忆采科技有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
91match
aegeh.com
重庆姜饼人商贸有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
90match
iyxqb.com
海口志兴贸易有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
aeorf.com
兰州市贾铭商贸有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
guoay.com
兰州市宁池商贸有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
kangourouetkoala.com
北京味渝餐饮管理有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
iudyeg.com
甘肃盼舜信息咨询有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
hdhae.com
淮安拾白电子商务有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
fcaqre.com
兰州市雨霞商贸有限公司azenui
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
fdekl.com
海口市渤辰餐饮管理有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
hbuszo.com
甘肃大湫信息科技服务有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
89match
fdfuu.com
成都祁炜橘茗餐饮管理有限公司
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
hcacoj.com
兰州市糯寻商贸行(个人独资)
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
hdebiq.com
甘州区凡卓百货店(个体工商户)azenui
7 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
heyonegroup.com
黑玩科技成都有限公司
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
bolitao.com
东莞市九州工艺品有限公司
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
54match
afkack.com
海口坚鸿祥科技有限公司
0 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.