Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nadel.dev

nadel.dev — Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
killianhoa.com
HK — Web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
rendyjaya.com
Rendy Jaya — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
malekabbes.com
Malek ABBES — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
nat-digital.com
Your Web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abdin.net
Abdin Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
reshubhatt.com
Reshu | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
evalallemand.com
Eva Lallemand — web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andynebs.com
Andrew Nebiosini — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
eternaldeveloper.com
Eternal Web Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
manueladidario.com
Manuela Di Dario — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andiwp.com
AndiWP — Web Developer - Laravel
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
charalamposevripidou.com
Charalampos Evripidou - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
demianvlasenko.com
Demian V. — Web Designer & Developer
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
76match
alexhedstrom.com
Alex Hedström — Web Developer & Freediver
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
imamaffandi.com
Imam Affandi | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
developerwebdesign.com
Developer Web Design
2 shared topicsweb-design-and-html
75match
axtn.io
Alex Tadevosyan - Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
develevatex.com
DevElevateX — Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.