Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nadam.dev

Khaled Nadam || Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
louguzman.dev
Luis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
theabgarg.com
Abhishek | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
thebuilderbob.com
Bob Le - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
reganmuthomi.com
Regan Muthomi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aboutjay.com
Jay Patel - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
furkanelmas.com
Furkan Elmas | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
mudithperera.com
Mudith Perera | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bytethecarrot.dev
Portfolio - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ahmadx.dev
Ahmad Hassan - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
eddymiguel.dev
Eddy Cedeño - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
luanpanno.dev
Luan Panno | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
owenkobasz.com
Owen Kobasz | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pahasara.dev
Pahasara - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
calebbellmyer.com
Caleb Bellmyer | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adamgrady.dev
Adam Grady | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.