Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nabilkd.com

nabil khondaker · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
pavelgelver.com
Pavel Gelver
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
pedromsluz.com
Pedro Luz
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
artofcode.info
Art of Code Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
sioncodes.com
SionCodes.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andryrads.com
It's me, Andry Rachdian Sumardi
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nalinporwal.com
Nalin's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
0xeb.net
Shortjump! | Reversing engineering, programming and what not…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
anmonteiro.com
anmonteiro · Code ramblings
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
alex-abraham.dev
Alex Abraham | Software Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
amirsalarsafaei.com
Amirsalar Safaei | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
teocos.com
teo's codex — Programming, engineering, robotics, defense, philosophy and experiments
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
terminalroot.com
Terminal Root
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
avi.im
v
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
1ob.com
Oskar Behzadpour — Student & Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
denniszubov.com
Dennis Zubov | Quant Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
developersdojo.com
Developers Dojo
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
renja.dev
Renja
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.