Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to nabilfayak.com

Nabil Fayak · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
repugraf.com
Serhii Mamedov — Resume
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
software-kinetics.co.uk 🇬🇧
Software Kinetics
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
devondwalker.com
DW - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pedrofeo.com
Pedro Féo
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewjohnson.dev
Resume - Andrew A. Johnson - Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewshamah.com
Amichai Shamah
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ikramhasan.com
Ikramul Hasan - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andrewkucz.com
Web & Mobile Applications Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexbush.me
Alex Bush | Full Stack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
axharkhan.me
Ashar Ali | Software engineer · APIs, web & cloud
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
cheikhmbackediop.com
Cheikh Mbacke Diop | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ignaciovila.com
Ignacio Vila - Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
malachidev.com
Malachi Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
2mio.com
Artem Poliukhovych | CV
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
demiladeotunaiya.com
Demilade Otunaiya | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
alexej-liebenthal.dev
Alexej Liebenthal - Engineering & Beyond
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
najamiftikhar.com
Najam Iftikhar | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
albertocastro.me
Senior Front-End Engineer – Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.