similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mwischer.com

Mwischer alternatives & similar sites

Marvin Wischer – Beratender Ingenieur TGA — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Construction Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ingenieurbuero-heine.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Heine Ingenieure: Gebäude nachhaltig planen	DE de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
iwb-sicherheitsingenieure.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	IWB Sicherheitsingenieure	DE de	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cns-design.at ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ingenieurbüro für Großküchenplanung \| CNS Desgin	AT de	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aoko.at ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	aoko architekten & ingenieure \| Ottensheim b. Linz	AT de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
keck-projektentwicklung.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ingenieurbüro Keck - Herzlich Willkommen	DE de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5d-institute.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	BIM – Beratung, Schulung, Training - 5D Institut	de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
b3-bau.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	b³ GmbH \| Architektur & Bauingenieurwesen	de	construction-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jpmayr.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	JP MAYR – Baggerunternehmen	de	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hr-ausbautechnik.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ihr Ingenieurbetrieb für Innenausbau im Saarland I HR Ausbautechnik	DE de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ingenieurbuero-goedecke.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ihr Partner - Goedecke Ingenieure GmbH in Bitterfeld-Wolfen	DE de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
az-plan.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	AZ-Plan GmbH - Planung und Beratung	de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heinemeyer-gruppe.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Heinemeyer Unternehmensgruppe \| Ingenieurrückbau - Tiefbau - Baulogistik	de	construction-industry Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
heinemeyer-gruppe.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Heinemeyer Unternehmensgruppe \| Ingenieurrückbau - Tiefbau - Baulogistik	DE de	construction-industry Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kayarnoldtech.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	KayArnoldTECH – Planungsgesellschaft für Gebäudetechnik in Hamburg	DE de	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caverion.at ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Lösungen in der Gebäudetechnik - Caverion ist Ihr erfahrener Partner - Caverion	AT de	construction-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henketeam.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ingenieurgemeinschaft Henke-IfG \| Großküchenplanung und Beratung	DE de	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
poltrock.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	POLTROCK – TRAGENDE LÖSUNGEN	de	construction-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jp-power.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	JP Power – Infrastruktur für Bau und Event	DE de	construction-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.