Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to muratcanuste.com

Home • Murat Can Üste · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
lucafaggianelli.com
Home • Luca Faggianelli
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andrewhong.me
Home • Andrew Hong
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
100-mark.com
Home • 100-Mark's Archive
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
simonwaite.com
Home | Simon Waite
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewkramer.dev
Build Artifacts with Andrew – Resources for DevOps and Software Engineers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
justinfriebel.com
Home • Justin Friebel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
aidanhibbard.dev
Home | Aidan Hibbard
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sirob.dev
Simon Roberts - Thoughts from an engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
muhammetmacit.com
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
mraxell.com
Home | Axbecher.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
albertp.dev
Albert Portnoy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewtc.dev
andrewtc
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
jrtashjian.com
JR Tashjian - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
tech-op.co.uk 🇬🇧
Chris Murton
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
1stvamp.org
Home — 1stvamp.org
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
luciosh.com
_home – luciosh
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
muratbayraktar.com
Murat Bayraktar
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bthaw.com
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.