Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to muradqubbaj.com

Murad Qubbaj, Postdoctoral and Instructor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
mrastwood.com
Michael Astwood | Personal website of Michael Astwood
2 shared topicsphysics
66match
padabed.com
Ivan Padabed
2 shared topicsscience
65match
adamphysics.com
Adam J. Czarnecki
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
pablojbilbao.com
P.J. Bilbao
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
atulanurag.com
Atul Anurag
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
adrian-huber.org
Home | Adrian Huber
2 shared topicsphysics
65match
costanzarodda.com
Costanza Rodda
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
aalopes.com
Alexandre Lopes personal website
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
justbevintage.com
Task Success Zone: Easy Instructions -
2 shared topicsscience
64match
acuadralara.com
Alberto Cuadra-Lara
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
anewkindofscience.org
Wolfram Science and Stephen Wolfram's 'A New Kind of Science'
2 shared topicsscience
64match
about-entropy.com
Entropy and infinite noise — Research by Matthias Olschowy
2 shared topicsphysics
64match
axis-photon.com
Axis Photonique - Streak Cameras and Ultrafast Instrumentation
2 shared topicsscience
63match
custommotionsystems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Physik Instrumente UK - Precision positioning solutions and piezo technology
2 shared topicsscience
63match
jsbryaniv.com
Shep Bryan IV | Physicist and Innovator
2 shared topicsscience
63match
ahmads.org
Syed Ahmad Raza, Ph.D. Mechanical Engineer and Researcher | Syed Ahmad Raza, Ph.D.
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
2dmater.com
2D Semiconductors - Advanced Quantum Materials
2 shared topicsphysics
63match
acrhem.org
ACRHEM,University of Hyderabad
2 shared topicsphysics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.