Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to muradhamad.dev

Murad Hamad - Junior Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
kaanbilgili.com
Kaan Bilgili — Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
kaankahraman.com
Kaan Kahraman - Java Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
mryujitanaka.com
Yuji Tanaka - Java Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
bypanda.dev
byPandaDev - Fullstack Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
refif.dev
Refif Ilan | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
ashokj.app
Ashok J — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
aarab.tech
Hamza Aarab | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
justintom.com
Justin Tom | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
refaelsinaga.com
Refael Sinaga | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
owenbush.dev
Owen Bush — Senior Developer · Denver, CO
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
junlongk.com
Jun Long - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
3dime.com
Idriss - Backend Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
alexdepasquale.dev
Alex De Pasquale | Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
pandepraditya.com
Pande Praditya | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
muntasirashif.com
Muntasir Ashif | Flutter Developer - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
fullstackcesar.com
César | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
muhamadfarihan.com
Muhamad Farihan | C#, ASP.NET and Angular Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
simproch.dev
Simon Prochazka | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.