Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to munaosman.com

Muna – Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
eggnita.com
Eggnita Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
asweh.com
Aan Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
sigurdurteitur.com
Teitur's Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
abdurraheem.me
My Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
74match
eeroseppanen.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
kaandinckal.com
App Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
mugisha.io
Mugisha Uwiragiye | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
jvaldepenas.com
Jabes Valdepeñas - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
aksan.info
Abdullah Aksan - Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
junoxlabs.com
THANUJA BANDARA | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mrdegbe.com
Raymond Degbe | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
aneesharama.dev
Portfolio | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
aalmamun.me
Abdullah Al Mamun — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
72match
mrakhudu.com
Moemedi Rakhudu | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
muhannadabushanab.com
Muhannad Abu Shanab | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
aceoroal.com
Anele Nkayi | Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
oyusof.com
Osman Yusof - Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
owenbellew.com
Owen Bellew Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.