Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mulligan.com

Mulligan Labs · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
sirohilabs.com
Sirohi Labs
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
65match
2nglabs.com
2NG Labs, LLC
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
63match
crefodderlabs.com
Crefodder Labs Pvt Ltd
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
63match
ec-labs.ai
EC Labs - Tech Impact IoT
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
63match
rednodelabs.com
RedNodeLabs
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
aadviklabs.com
Aadvik Teklabs
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
aadvikteklabs.com
Aadvik Teklabs
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
muphile.com
Muphile Labs | Electronics Product Engineering
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
astralabstech.com
Astra Labs Pvt. Ltd. | Research, IoT & Innovation
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
lotvv.com
Rawdata IIoT Analyzer
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
fscratchlabs.com
FScratch Labs Ltd. — Innovate Locally, Impact Globally
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
redalertlabs.com
Red Alert Labs - Bringing Trust to the Internet of Things
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
62match
remosolabs.com
Cutting Edge Monitoring Devices and Solutions | Remoso Labs
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
61match
oxyscorp.com
IIOT-OXYS - Intelligent Edge
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
61match
oxovio.com
Oxovio — Building Intelligence
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
61match
relyq.com
relyQ - Intelligence to rely on.
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
61match
signlia.com
Signlia - E-ink Label Management
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things
61match
cpslab.dev
Cyber Physical System (CPS) Lab | Notion
1 shared topicsinternet-of-things

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.