Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to muhammad-umar.com

Dr. Muhammad Umar — Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ibrahimbadsha.com
Home | Basha Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
71match
ruixinoh.com
Rui Xin Oh - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
71match
sameralqaisi.com
Samer AlQaisi — Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
69match
sarahgucciardo.com
Sarah Gucciardo Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
axelgoh.com
Axel's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
mschecter.com
Michael Schecter • Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
muhammadskaka.com
Muhammad Skaka
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
oscarbejas.com
Personal Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
palakdwivedi.com
Professional Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
68match
onixytech.com
ONIXYTECH | PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
albertgabay.com
Albert Gabay | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
sarthakvilaspatel.com
Sarthak Patel | Data Engineering Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
aksaha.dev
Amit Kumar Saha | Professional Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
nxtify.com
Nxtify Technologies Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
gilangsp.com
Gilang Satria Putra | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
67match
ernikeshneel.com
Er.Nikkesh Neel - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
66match
5layersdeep.com
5 Layers Deep | Patent Portfolio & Deep-Tech Licensing
1 shared topicstechnology-industry
66match
axisbim.io
Joe Kendsersky — CV
1 shared topicstechnology-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.