Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mugwhy.com

Mugwhy · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
bruits.org
Bruits
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
build47.com
Build47
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sine8.com
sine8 – Regulator Monitoring Platform
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
4rkal.com
4rkal's Dev Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
corvusoft.com
Corvusoft
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bybyte.org
bybyte
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
acarcher.dev
Projects | Alexander Archer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mstefan99.com
Mikhail Stefantsev
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
redridgepd.com
Home - RedRidge Product Development
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lowheap.com
Home - Lowheap
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buildandlead.com
Build And Lead | How to design apps and manage software teams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ozerouali.com
Hi, I'm Oumaima | Oumi's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
burritalks.io
🌯 Burritalks - Curated Tech Talks on DDD, Architecture, Agile & More
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abstractioneer.org
Abstractioneer by John Panzer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
abrahamlozanoserna.com
Abraham Lozano - Problem Solver and Product Manager
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bruceharrod.com
Bruce John Harrod - My digital playground
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
lorenzobaronio.com
Code & Cables By Lorenzo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
p-gaspar.com
Pedro Gaspar | Gravatar
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.